cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota yogyakarta,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Justitia et Pax
Published by Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta
ISSN : 08521883     EISSN : 25413007     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
JEP is primarily aimed to facilitate the legal scholars, researchers or practitioners in publishing their original or reviewed articles as well as to support the enactment of in-depth discussions on the related issues. It is also purposed to become a source of reference for those are involved in legal field. JEP covers any topics related to Indonesian laws and legal system, spanning from the private and public law and covering various legal approaches, such as the comparative law, sociology of law, legal history and many others. Other contemporary legal studies, such as commercial and business law, medical law, law and technology, natural resources law and Islamic law are also covered. Hence, any contributions from legal scholars and practitioners are appreciatively welcomed.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 9 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 35 No. 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019" : 9 Documents clear
PROSPEK PEMBERLAKUAN HUKUM ADAT DALAM HUKUM PIDANA NASIONAL Vincentius Patria Setyawan
Justitia et Pax Vol. 35 No. 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i2.2069

Abstract

This study aims to determine the existence of customary law specifically related to customary offenses in national criminal law and its implementation that has been applied so far, and to find out the prospects for its application after the HP bills have been implemented. The results of this research are to provide an overview of present and future.
MACROPRUDENTIAL AND MICROPRUDENTIAL POLICY IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF LAW NUMBER 21 OF 2011 Anita Christiani; Rendhy Oktovianus Lisai
Justitia et Pax Vol. 35 No. 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i2.2434

Abstract

The establishment of FSA has brought about the consequences of macroprudential policies which are still under the authority of Bank Indonesia while the microprudential  policies have been the Auhtority of FSA. The problem in this study is what the appropriate definition, characteristics and coverage of macroprudential and microprudential supervision regulatory authority are in order to support the economic stability of a country. This type of research was a normative study. The results showed that the definition of macroprudential regulation and supervision policy is the authority given to Bank Indonesia to conduct regulation and supervision of banking institutions out of the institution and health fields, prudential aspect, and bank examination. The characteristics of microprudential and macroprudential banking regulation and supervision can be seen from the policy focus.
MENGGUGAT PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TENTANG PENCALONAN MANTAN NARAPIDANA DALAM PEMILU Jamaludin Ghafur
Justitia et Pax Vol. 35 No. 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i2.2436

Abstract

The constitutional court through its decision No. 42 / PUU-XIII / 2015 states that all ex-convicts may run in elections as long as their political rights are not revoked by the court. They are only required to honestly and openly announce to the public about their convict status. according to the Court, the limitation and even revocation of the political rights of ex-convicts must not be carried out by lawmakers through legislation instruments but must be with a court decision as regulated in Article 35 paragraph (1) number 3 of the Criminal Code. This decision is not entirely correct for two reasons. First, Indonesia as a country that adheres to a continental European legal system (civil law system), the law has a higher position as a source of law (primary sources of law). Whereas the court's decision only as one of the secondary sources of law. Second, the conflict between the Election Law and the Criminal Code should be resolved according to the lex specialis derogat legi generalist principle. Thus, the prohibition for ex-convicts to run for the election as regulated in the Election Law should be interpreted as a specialist regulation so that it can override the provisions contained in the Criminal Code.
AKIBAT HUKUM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 69/PUU-XIII/2015 TERHADAP HAK TANAH PELAKU KAWIN CAMPUR Jihan Khairunnisa
Justitia et Pax Vol. 35 No. 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i2.2497

Abstract

Land ownership for Indonesian citizens the result of mixed marriages without marriage agreement Indonesian citizen can only use the use rights and lease rights to buildings in the ownership of land. This study uses a normative juridical approach. It can be concluded that according to Law No. 5/1960 for Indonesian citizens, mixed marriages may own land with a status other than use rights and lease rights to buildings if there is a marriage agreement before or at the time of marriage. However, after the Constitutional Court ruling number 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 gave a breath of fresh air for mixed marriages to still be able to receive their constitutional rights by making marriage agreements during the marriage.
URGENSI REKONSTRUKSI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MEMBERIKAN PERTIMBANGAN KEBIJAKAN HUKUM TERBUKA (OPEN LEGAL POLICY) Muhammad Addi Fauzani; Fandi Nur Rohman
Justitia et Pax Vol. 35 No. 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i2.2501

Abstract

This research has two problem formulations, First, how the Constitutional Court's construction in giving consideration to "open legal policy"; Second, what is the urgency of the Constitutional Court's reconstruction in giving consideration to"open legal policy"? This research uses a normative juridical study using the statutory and conceptual approach. The results of this study are: First, that is a lack of clarity and consistency from the Constitutional Court in determining benchmarks for open legal policy considerations. Second, there are new concept been proposed: a) applying the doctrine of "political question"; b) The Constitutional Court still tests a norm based on formal and substantial requirements. The advice given is that Constitutional Court should take a position in accordance with the reconstruction proposed in this study.
EVALUASI YURIDIS SISTEM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PEMILIHAN UMUM DAN IUS CONSTITUENDUM PERADILAN KHUSUS PEMILIHAN UMUM Nurul Ula Ulya; Fazal Akmal Musyarri
Justitia et Pax Vol. 35 No. 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i2.2508

Abstract

The General Election Judicial System in Indonesia currently runs partially in Indonesia because the institutional structure that plays a role in handling General Election cases consists of elusive anatomy. Some of these institutions include the Constitutional Court, the Election Supervisory Body, the Administrative Court and the District Court which have different portions of authority and lack synergy in their representation. This can lead to miscoordination and overlapping of authority. Therefore, the formation of a Special Election Judicial body is an alternative solution that can be done to maintain the implementation of a democratic General Election up to the stage of case resolution.
PERKEMBANGAN PEMBUKTIAN PADA PUTUSAN VERSTEK: STUDI KASUS DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SLEMAN DAN KOTA YOGYAKARTA Elisabeth Sundari; Nindry Sulistya Widiastiani
Justitia et Pax Vol. 35 No. 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i2.2936

Abstract

Article 25 of HIR provides that in case the defendant does not appear at court process (verstek), the claim will be accepted unless it is unreasonable and against the rights. In the beginning, that article was interpreted that in case the defendant doesn’t  appear at court process (verstek), the plaintiff shall not obeyed to proof his claim. How is the development of that previous interpretation? Normative legal research has been conducted to redress that issue. The data were collected from secondary data resources from Sleman and Yogyakarta District Court decisions concerning the burden of proof  in verstek recently,  and being  analized  qualitatively. The research result shows that there is a development in  interpretating Article 125 HIR, where the judges burdened the plaintiff to proof his claim. That interpretation development supports the strive to get the truth beyond reasonable doubt, to meet a fair decision,  as good as to avoid fraud claim, and haphazard decision.
Author Index Volume 35 2019 Justitia Et Pax Manager
Justitia et Pax Vol. 35 No. 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i2.3614

Abstract

Subject Index Volume 35 2019 Justitia Et Pax Manager
Justitia et Pax Vol. 35 No. 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i2.3615

Abstract

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 9

 1 

Filter by Year

2019 2019


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 39 No. `1 (2023): Justitia et Pax Volume 39 Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Vol. 38 No. 2 (2022): Justitia et Pax Volume 38 Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 Vol. 38 No. 1 (2022): Justitia et Pax Volume 38 Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 Vol. 37 No. 2 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 2 Tahun 2021 Vol 37, No 2 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 2 Tahun 2021 Vol. 37 No. 1 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 1 Tahun 2021 Vol 37, No 1 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 1 Tahun 2021 Vol. 36 No. 2 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 2 Tahun 2020 Vol 36, No 2 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 2 Tahun 2020 Vol. 36 No. 1 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 Vol 36, No 1 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 Vol 35, No 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 Vol. 35 No. 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 Vol. 35 No. 1 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Vol 35, No 1 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Vol. 34 No. 2 (2018): Justitia et Pax Volume 34 Nomor 2 Tahun 2018 Vol 34, No 2 (2018): Justitia et Pax Volume 34 Nomor 2 Tahun 2018 Vol. 34 No. 1 (2018): Justitia et Pax Volume 34 Nomor 1 Tahun 2018 Vol 34, No 1 (2018): Justitia et Pax Volume 34 Nomor 1 Tahun 2018 Vol 33, No 2 (2017): Justitia et Pax Volume 33 Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 Vol. 33 No. 2 (2017): Justitia et Pax Volume 33 Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 Vol 33, No 1 (2017): Justitia Et Pax Volume 33 Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 Vol. 33 No. 1 (2017): Justitia Et Pax Volume 33 Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 Vol. 32 No. 2 (2016): Justitia Et Pax Volume 32 Nomor 2 Tahun 2016 Vol 32, No 2 (2016): Justitia Et Pax Volume 32 Nomor 2 Tahun 2016 Vol 32, No 1 (2016): Justitia et Pax Volume 32 Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Vol. 32 No. 1 (2016): Justitia et Pax Volume 32 Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Vol. 31 No. 2 (2015): Justitia Et Pax Volume 31 Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 Vol 31, No 2 (2015): Justitia Et Pax Volume 31 Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 More Issue